WND has more enlarged pictures and additional information.
(click picture for larger view) Image from WND.
Sunday, August 2, 2009
California Attorney Orly Taitz Claims She Has Obama's Kenyan Birth Certificate (picture)
I have no idea if this is for real, but California Attorney Orly Taitz claims she has filed a motion in District Court to have it authenticated. This signed Kenyan birth certificate lists Obama's parents as Barack Hussein Obama and Stanley Ann Obama, formerly Stanley Ann Dunham, the birth date as Aug. 4, 1961, and the hospital of birth as Coast General Hospital in Mombasa, Kenya. We should withhold judgment until more information comes out.
WND has more enlarged pictures and additional information.
(click picture for larger view) Image from WND.
WND has more enlarged pictures and additional information.
(click picture for larger view) Image from WND.
I am of the opinion that Obambie is in fact hiding something, and that's why he doesn't release any official records whatsoever. I think he attended college and law school, and received loans for same, as a "foreign" student. In other words, he took advantage of the system to get a free ride in school. Beyond that, I'm willing to look at proof that he was not born in Hawaii, but I have to say, this document isn't doing it for me. If it was signed by his father and the registrar, that would be one thing - but where this form provides for such, I just see type-written names. In other words, anyone could have gotten this form and filled it in using a standard typewriter. This document suffers from the same problem we have with Obambie's "Certificate of Live Birth" i.e., it ain't an "original" document.
ReplyDelete"If it was signed by his father and the registrar, that would be one thing - but where this form provides for such, I just see type-written names. In other words, anyone could have gotten this form and filled it in using a standard typewriter. This document suffers from the same problem we have with Obambie's "Certificate of Live Birth" i.e., it ain't an "original" document."
ReplyDeleteActually, the full version on the website I linked has a signature of a Deputy Registrar.
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=105764
Please note this document lists the issue date as 1964 and has a seal and signature. The paper and seal can be easily verified. The signature can be verified if the person is still living or if other documents with that signature turn up.
ReplyDeleteIf it's verifiable then why not make it public. Hello? You'd think Clinton would of covered this base already..
ReplyDeleteQUESTION:
ReplyDeleteWhat happens to Judge Sotomayor’s confirmation as Supreme Court Justice if the Constitution’s “natural born citizen” Presidential eligibility requirement is subsequently determined applicable to Barack Obama on the basis of Article 2’s exclusion of dual citizenship birth (doesn’t matter whether Obama born in Hawaii since his dad was Kenyan/British citizen at the time)? It would seem prudent, if not dereliction of Constitutional duty in not so doing, for the United States Senate to defer voting on Judge Sotomayor’s confirmation at the very least until there is determination, now imminent, on standing in Kerchner v. Congress (USDC NJ) on that precise issue (Congressional failure to take up the raised and known constitutional ineligibility question prior to declaring a Presidential winner in the vote of the electoral college). For the full Senate now to proceed to vote to confirm Judge Sotomayor (an otherwise lifetime appointment) before then, would be a knowing and very substantial exacerbation of any inherent Constitutional crisis — compounding the previous Congressional dereliction. That is, the Executive Branch, as well as conceivably all actions of a Congress under a President determined ineligible, would leave the Supreme Court as an essential unfettered remaining Branch of the Federal Government, that is unfettered so long as Mr. Obama’s nominee to the Court is not yet confirmed by the Senate.
Will not one Senator, let alone Republican Senator, raise this issue on the Senate floor? The nation is watching.
Leave a Reply
How can you say the Supreme court is "unfettered." When the appeal went before the SCOTUS BEFORE the swearing in ceremony on Jan 20th, and the SCOTUS ignored the appeals, and for that matter DENIED the people's petitions, and there have been numerous PEOPLE'S GRAND JURIES and the courts have all ignored them, then the court system from the lower court to the SCOTUS are conspirators "all."
ReplyDeleteOnly the PEOPLE AND perhaps the STATES can claim to fix this mess. BUT NOT CONGRESS, NOT THE SCOTUS nor anyone in the Federal Cesspool.
Anonymous said...
ReplyDelete"If it's verifiable then why not make it public. Hello? You'd think Clinton would of covered this base already.."
The document has been posted on the internet and Taitz claims she is gong to ask a court to verify it. We shall see.
"Please note this document lists the issue date as 1964 and has a seal and signature. The paper and seal can be easily verified. The signature can be verified if the person is still living or if other documents with that signature turn up."
ReplyDeleteYou probably don't even have to go to all that trouble.
The document, supposedly issued by the Republic of Kenya, was dated by the registrar in February 1964.
The Republic of Kenya didn't officially exist until December 1964.
Somebody went to all that trouble, forging a birth certificate and all, and they never checked the dates. LMAO
I love it. You "birthers" are making such asses of yourself and don't even know it. It is just like the "tea baggers" all over again.
ReplyDeleteThe Republican party is disintegrating right before my eyes.